Put to death therefore what is earthly in you; and covetousness, which is idolatry. (Col 3:5 ESV, my emphasis)
Well, even if I really enjoyed something, I still often want more.
The principal example involves encyclopedias, preferably the now-out-of-print Encyclopedia Britannica. Also with their CD/DVD options gone, all they have is the internet. But since I have all three of them (and the DVD and internet very similar, I have some quality info on our side.
Now here’s the catch: In an internet dominated world, encyclopedias have been all but pulled off from reference shelves. But I’ve been a little nosey here. I seem to seek a equivalent pathway, tracking what elese may match a source’s content, just to see what others may see on the same topic.
Well, everyone has different research needs for the same thing. Look at the folllowing passage from 1 Timothy 6:6-10 (ESV)
But godliness with contentment is great gain, for we brought nothing into the world, and[c] we cannot take anything out of the world. But if we have food and clothing, with these we will be content. But those who desire to be rich fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pangs.
While money and material goods are not evil in themselves, such issues shows that Jesus, in his Parable of the Sower, “riches can be deceitful.” This is true especially when you sell things, but that’s a different story.
Back to my situation: Not only that everyone’s search needs are different, one’s “Googling” is none of another “Googler’s” business. So rather than get into competititon between what sources I have and what’s available to others, it’s best just to “count your blessings” and when exploring for more, be content on that you can find, and treasure that. Metaphorically, that is a new car among many used ones.
Also, the idolatry here is that of knowledge. As individuals, no person is a clone concerning interest. It won’t work, so let it be.
This does not rule out sharing knowledge with others. I can by all means benefit ohers with such a tactic. But I can hereby say that it’s not my job to be speculate on others’ research inquiries to get the “same results.” It’s not logical, it’s not ethical, it’s not practical, it’s not, well you get the idea, to do such “speculative searching” online